Ultrasound · Radiofrequency · Pacific Plaza

Ultherapy vs Thermage —
How They Differ

Ultherapy vs Thermage is a comparison of two kinds of heat. Ultherapy places focused ultrasound in small points down to the SMAS, the support layer under the skin, while Thermage warms a broad layer of the dermis with monopolar radiofrequency. Both are offered at Atelier, and Dr Sin Yong chooses between them, or uses both, according to which layer has loosened and how much facial fat there is to protect.

How Each Works

Points Of Heat, Or A Field Of Heat

Book a Consultation

Ultherapy, made by Merz, is micro-focused ultrasound with visualisation. The handpiece shows the skin, fat and SMAS on a screen, then converges ultrasound into small heated points at about 4.5 mm (the SMAS, the plane a surgical facelift repositions), 3.0 mm or 1.5 mm, with the surface left intact. Each point contracts and then remodels, so the change builds over weeks. Details are on the Ultherapy page.

Thermage FLX, made by Solta Medical, is monopolar radiofrequency at 6.78 MHz. Current passes from a treatment tip through the tissue to a return pad, warming the deep dermis and the fibrous strands beneath it as one volume, while bursts of cryogen spray cool the surface. There is no imaging: the tip and energy setting control depth. Atelier describes the treatment plane as reaching roughly 65–75 °C. See Thermage at Atelier.

So the real difference is not ultrasound against radiofrequency as brands, but focused points in a deeper support layer against an even field of warmth in the skin.

Side By Side

Thermage vs Ultherapy Compared

The table compares how each treatment works, not which is better; the studies below found no clear winner.

Ultherapy vs Thermage FLX
UltherapyThermage FLX
Energy or mechanismMicro-focused ultrasound with real-time imagingMonopolar radiofrequency, 6.78 MHz, with cryogen cooling
Depth and targetPoints at about 4.5 mm (SMAS), 3.0 mm and 1.5 mmBroad heating of the deep dermis and fibrous septa
Typical sessionsOne session, judged at about three months; any repeat set thenPlanned as a single session; more is discussed at follow-up
Comfort and numbingBrief, deep heat, stronger over bone; numbing creamHeat pulses followed by cooling bursts
DowntimeRedness for hours; jaw tenderness for several days, sometimes longerRedness, warmth and mild swelling that usually settle quickly
When results showCollagen builds over 8–12 weeks; improvement develops over three to six monthsDevelops over two to six months
Who it suitsEarly descent at the jowl, brow or under the chin, with enough soft tissueCrepey texture and mild, widespread looseness, including around the eyes
At AtelierOffered at AtelierOffered at Atelier

The Evidence

What Head-To-Head Studies Found

Direct comparisons are few and small. In a randomised split-face study of 20 patients followed for six months, monopolar radiofrequency and micro-focused ultrasound both improved laxity, with no significant difference between them (Alhaddad 2019). A study of 20 patients treated on the neck also found results that were not significantly different, and ultrasound was the more painful of the two (Jones 2017). An earlier lower-face study of micro-focused ultrasound, with 93 patients evaluated, found weaker outcomes in people with a body mass index above 30 (Oni 2014).

The fair reading is that neither has been shown to be better overall. What changes the outcome is matching the energy to the layer that has loosened.

Which Problem

Which Problem Suits Which

  • Looseness deeper down, along the jawline and under the chin: focused ultrasound reaches the SMAS directly, which suits Ultherapy, or HIFU without imaging.
  • Skin quality and fine crepiness over a wide area: broad dermal heating usually fits better, which suits Thermage.
  • Both at once: common, since the two work on different layers; they are sometimes planned together, in an order set at assessment.
  • A lean or hollow face: heat reaching fat that is not the target can deepen hollows after either treatment, so the plan is conservative, or volume is restored first through volume restoration.
  • Heavy, overhanging skin: a surgical question that neither treatment answers.

For a broader look at focused ultrasound brands, see Ultherapy vs HIFU.

How Atelier Decides

Layer First, Device Second

Dr SY examines the face at rest and in movement and feels the thickness of skin and fat in each zone, so the plan starts from where laxity sits and how much fat the face can spare. From there the choice may be Ultherapy, Thermage, both, or neither. In a lean face, the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift, monopolar radiofrequency on the Volnewmer platform with continuous water cooling, may be preferred; in a fuller lower face, the Time Freeze Laser LCLR® may be. Dr Sin Yong holds a Key Opinion Leader appointment with CLASSYS, which makes Volnewmer.

Ask any clinic three things: which layer it thinks has loosened, how much fat it is protecting, and how the result will be judged.

Ultherapy

FAQ

Ultherapy vs Thermage — Common Questions

Ask a Question
No. In two small randomised studies of 20 patients each, one on the face and one on the neck, micro-focused ultrasound and monopolar radiofrequency both improved laxity, and the difference between them was not significant. That does not make them interchangeable; it means the better choice for one person depends on which layer has loosened and on skin quality, not on the device name.
Sometimes, because they work on different layers: Ultherapy on the deeper support layer along the jaw and under the chin, Thermage on the skin across a wider area. Whether to combine them, and in which order, is decided at assessment. A combined plan sets the sequence and spacing in advance, and a face that is lean may not suit adding both kinds of heat.
It varies from person to person and with the settings. Ultherapy is usually felt as brief, deep heat that is stronger over bone, such as the jawline, and in one neck study it was the more painful of the two. Thermage feels like a pulse of heat followed by a cooling burst. Neither usually needs an anaesthetic injection, and energy is adjusted to comfort.
For crepey eyelid skin, Thermage is the one with a tip designed for the eyelid, used with a protective shield over the eye. Ultherapy is not used on the eyelid itself, although shallow lines along the brow can tighten the tissue behind a low brow. Hooding from surplus lid skin or a low lid margin is a surgical question for both.
Both are monopolar radiofrequency platforms working at 6.78 MHz. They differ in their cooling, Volnewmer using continuous water cooling rather than cryogen, and in their tips. Volnewmer is the platform for the VF Lift – Vertical Facelift at Atelier, planned area by area. It is not focused ultrasound, so it does not replace Ultherapy where the SMAS is the target.

Dr Sin Yong holds a Key Opinion Leader appointment with CLASSYS.

Read about this in the Atelier patient app

Continue

Related at Atelier

More on this topic

Atelier Aesthetics · Owned by AYA

Two kinds of heat, —
chosen by the layer that loosened.

9 Scotts Road, Pacific Plaza #12-01A, Singapore 228210 · +65 8023 7170

Book a Consultation